Industry Standards: Titling Your Music

[sociallocker]Every industry you can imagine has a set of standards in which the professionals abide by in order to keep things uniform. The same is true for the music industry, and when you consider the vast amount of music being made, and distributed, it’s essential to have a set of guidelines to keep track of it all. Not only that, but if you want your music to be recognized by the multitude of media players out there, you’ll have to submit the song information to GraceNote following those exact guidelines.

Capitalization
Gracenote’s standard is to capitalize the first letter of each word, including articles. PLEASE DO NOT TYPE IN ALL-CAPS or all-lowercase even if all titles appear that way on the CD cover. Designers of CD covers sometimes use all-caps or all-lowercase because it looks cool in a particular typeface, but it doesn’t look so cool in a text display. Rare exceptions might be artist names that always appear in all-caps or all-lowercase (such ABBA, NRBQ, k.d. lang, or eels).

Standard: For English language submits, the first letter of each word is capitalized, including articles such as “a,” “the,” “and,” etc.

Example:
Title: Party In The U.S.A.
Artist: Miley Cyrus
Album: The Time Of Our Lives

Album Title Standards

Situation Standard Example
Multiple-Disc Releases Add “[Disc #]” after title 69 Love Songs [Disc 1]
Singles Add “[Single]” after title Fearless [Single]
Live Albums Add “[Live]” after title Frampton Comes Alive! [Live]

Track Title Standards

Situation Standard Example
Live Albums Add “[Live]” after title Paparazzi [Live]
Differentiating Information
(i.e. Acoustic Version, Instrumental)
Add info in brackets after title Forever [Instrumental]
Forever [Extended Version]
Forever [Radio Edit]
“Clean” versions Add “[Clean]” after title Gangsta Luv [Clean]
Remix Add “(Remix)” after title if specific remix Whatcha Say (Bill Hamel Club Mix)

Compilations
A compilation is an album with tracks by different artists, such as a soundtrack or sampler. The Artist Name should almost always be Various Artists. Soundtracks and scores should almost always have the genre of Film Soundtrack or Score. Please turn on the compilation checkbox and fill in the artist and genre for each track. Please do not place the song name and the artist name together in the track field.

Since many compilations gather together songs from many different periods, having the original year of release for the song is also very important. After all, just because the album was released in 2003 doesn’t mean that the Aerosmith song “Dream On” was. Now, an anthology is an album of tracks all by the same artist, but put together from several other albums or sources. Do not turn on the compilation checkbox for an anthology.

Artist, Featuring Artist, Co-Artist

Situation Standard Example
Artist, Featuring Artist, Co-Artist Artist 1, Artist 2, … & Artist X Kid Rock & Sheryl Crow
Featured Guest Artists Main Artist(s) Feat. Guest Artist(s) The-Dream Feat. Rick Ross & Ludacris
Introductions Main Artist Presents Other Artist Goldtrix Presents Andrea Brown

 

via GraceNote
[/sociallocker]

Top 5 Sites to Host Your Music On and Grow Your Fan-base (2021)

When we first wrote this 7 years ago, streaming was nowhere near where it is now. We have some work on our hands!

As an artist, you should be reaping the rewards for your hard work, and regardless of what genre of music you make, you should not be giving your music away for FREE. That doesn’t mean you have to necessarily sell it, but exchanging a download for an email can be just as valuable in the long run. So we’ve compiled a list of the best websites to host your music on – which allow you to do just that. Excluded from this list would be sites such as Itunes, Google play store, Tune Core, CD Baby, Soundcloud, HNHH, Datpiff and PureVolume.  The reason being is that you either get NO fan contact information or you get one hell of a commission taken out of your sales. So unless you’re up there in popularity with the likes of Adele, or Rihanna, and know your music will go viral on its own, you should undoubtedly be using one of these sites to distribute your music and strategically grow your fan-base.

Updated: July 24, 2017 – Bonus platform added for profitable musicians

1. TuneCore

“Before TuneCore, artists needed a label to get their music sold online. In 2006, we changed the game by partnering with digital stores to allow any musician to sell their songs worldwide while keeping 100% of their sales revenue. Today, TuneCore is the world’s leading digital music aggregator. Upload your music, complete the checkout, and we’ll do the rest. Your music will hit digital stores like Spotify and Apple Music in no time.”

Website: www.tunecore.com

Features:

  • Advertising on website
  • Widgets
  • Social & Email Sharing
  • Upload up to 20 songs
  • Name your price tips
  • Gather fan information

Pros:

Cons:

See It In Action:

Our Thoughts

2. United Masters

United Masters

“UnitedMasters comes with a premium suite of products designed to help you distribute music, get more streams, and everything in between. Take your career to the next level now.”

In the News:

Website: unitedmasters.com

Features:

  • M

Pros: 

Cons:

Our Thoughts:

3. BandCamp

band camp

“We’re a publishing platform for bands, or, anthropomorphically/arthropodically-speaking, your fifth, fully geeked-out Beatle — the one who keeps your very own website humming and lets you get back to making great music and building your fan base.”

Website: www.bandcamp.com

Features:

  • Multiple file formats
  • Name-your-price downloads
  • Real-time Statistics
  • Search Engine Optimization
  • Viral distribution
  • Mobile friendly
  • Physical + Digital sales
  • Sell within Facebook
  • Fulfillment Partner integration
  • Discount codes
  • Bonus downloads
  • Design customization
  • Multiple currencies
  • Soundscan reporting
  • Pre-orders
  • Metadata
  • Build your mailing list
  • Support

Pros: 200 download credits.  Free basic account.

Cons: 15% Revenue sharing. Tacky design.

Our Thoughts: Well if you’re reading this you probably know that everyone and their Momma’ uses Bandcamp. It definitely serves it’s purpose very well, but the interface isn’t as snazzy as others on this list. It also doesn’t offer as many of the features as others do. I think bands just use it because, like we said, everyone and their momma’ uses it. Chances are it was probably the first of it’s kind which gives it so much popularity.

4. StereoLoad

StereoLoad.com Review

“Stereoload helps you increase your Twitter and Soundcloud followers by requiring your fans to follow you before they can download your music.”

Website: www.stereoload.com

Features:

  •  SoundCloud Integration
  • Unlimited Campaign Creation

Pros: Clean design. Social sharing. It’s FREE. No download limit.

Cons: Only utilizes Twitter and Soundcloud.

See It In Action: Click Here

Our Thoughts: StereoLoad is a pretty new platform as far as we know. While it doesn’t allow you to grow an email list, it does offer the ability to grow your social media followers which at the end of the day, is still better than giving your music away completely free. With it being a free service, there’s really no downside to using it. The cool thing about it is that if you make really good music and know how to market it correctly, SteroLoad can help you gain a significant amount of new followers on Twitter and SoundCloud.

 5. ToneDen

ToneDen - Automated Social Marketing and Advertising - https___www.toneden.io_

“Create awesome marketing campaigns that help you get more followers, shares, and likes while building a rich database of your audience at the same time.”

2020 Update:

Website: www.TenDen.io

Features:

  • Facebook Advertising
  • Contests
  • Email & Messenger marketing
  • Social Unlocks
  • Landing page creator

Pros: Intuitive design, convenient customer support,

Cons: limited social & streaming platforms, marginally high monthly cost if you’re not making an ROI.

See It In Action: Click Here

Our Thoughts: ToneDen is a true gem for artists who have the means to invest in their careers. It provides a simple to use platform for acquiring, engaging and activating new fans. The fact that it acts as not only an advertising platform but a “lead capture” platform as well is why we decided to include it in the article.

In conclusion, if you’re serious about making a living doing what you love, you need to focus on growing your fan base, because in the future those numbers will need to convert to dollars. Anyone of these sites can definitely help you do that by capturing a simple email. I don’t know about you but most people check their email very often and are much more likely to hit play on a track that is sent directly to them via email compared to hitting play on the social media posts. you tag them in.

If there’s any other notable music hosting sites you think we missed and should add, please feel free to comment below. Make sure you like our Facebook page for valuable updates!

Multiple Rights Deals in the Music Industry

By Jay Rosenthal
Edited by Julian Bentley, 2009
Published by the International Association of Entertainment Lawyers
                                                                                                         
                                                                                                   

360 Deals and Music Publishing

 

By Jay Rosenthal, Esq.*

New concerns continue to arise as record labels try to expand the scope of the “360” deal to include what otherwise would be sacrosanct income streams of the artist.  Regarding music publishing, record labels have always focused on limiting their financial obligations to the artist/songwriter via the controlled composition clause.  However, as economic pressure pushes labels toward actually acquiring a financial or even equity share of the singer/songwriter’s overall publishing income, new issues emerge and unintended consequences will ultimately result.

The overall “360” concept seems to be a financial winner for the record labels, and ultimately a loser for artists and managers.  In fact, the Copyright Royalty Board in the United States has recently noticed this phenomenon in their recent Mechanical and Digital Phonorecord Delivery Rate Determination Proceeding (“The CRB Ruling”).  The CRB refused to accede to the RIAA’s request to decrease the mechanical penny rate or switch to a percentage of revenue formula, for a number of reasons, including the Publisher’s contention that the record labels improved their financial condition by adopting the “360” model.

One can understand why a record label would try to secure a publishing share from their singer/songwriter.  While mechanicals are down, public performance and third party licensing income is holding steady.  Publishing is one income stream that has a chance of actually realizing a sizeable return, even in this age of piracy.

As a preliminary matter, publishers would almost always protest or reject any attempt by a signed songwriter/artist to enter into a “360” deal assigning a significant songwriter publishing equity share to their record label.  But the dynamic changes if the artist has not signed a publishing agreement.  Without the protection of a publisher, a songwriter/artist faces a tough choice – give into what essentially is a contract of adhesion without excising the publishing grab or pass on perhaps a once in a lifetime opportunity.

So without a publisher involved, the artist attorney must address some fairly serious issues:

Cross-Collateralization:  Generally, if asked, a major label would not cross-collateralize mechanical royalties against other artist expenses in a traditional
Artist/label agreement.  In a “360” deal, however, the label will try to cross-collateralize the entire label share, as well as the full artist/songwriter mechanical share, if possible.  Artist attorneys should try to minimize the record label’s natural tendency to cross-collateralize everything.

• Controlled Composition Clauses:  Labels already force many singer/songwriters to accept the draconian limitations on the statutory royalty rate and the number of compositions paid on each album.  If the label will now control or own a significant portion of the composition, the impact of the reduced rates and other limitations seem particularly inappropriate.  Perhaps seeking a full repudiation of the controlled composition clause is a proper goal for the singer/songwriter forced into a “360” arrangement.

• Approval Rights:  If a label controls and/or owns a significant share of the musical composition, approval rights issues will ultimately arise.  For example, will a label have the right to enter into non-exclusive third party licensing arrangement without the authority of the co-owner, i.e., the singer/songwriter or their publisher?

• Late Fees:  The CRB Ruling established, for the first time, a 1.5% monthly late fee to be paid by the record labels if mechanical royalties are not paid to the publishers within the statutory time requirements, i.e., 20 days after the end of the month of distribution of the phonorecord.  Ironically, the record labels may now have more incentive to pay before the late fee accrues, since they now co-own or control the composition.  What should not happen is that the record labels somehow waive or attempt to waive the late fee.

These are just some of the problems and issues needing attention from the singer/songwriter attorney when faced with a grab of publishing rights in the ever expanding “360” deal world.  I am sure many more will arise as the “360” deal becomes the norm, instead of the exception.

 

Music Publishing 101

COPYRIGHT LAW BASICS

Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution of the United States

“Congress shall have the power to … To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.”

 

U.S. COPYRIGHT ACT

Grants Exclusive Rights to Copyright Authors or Owners

  • Right to Reproduce
  • Right to Make Derivative Works
  • Right to Distribute
  • Right to Perform
  • Right to Display

EVERY RECORDED SONG CONTAINS TWO COPYRIGHTS

   1) MUSICAL COMPOSITION
The notes and lyrics of the song

   2) SOUND RECORDING
The Recording Artist’s recorded version of the song

Even if the recording artist is the songwriter, two copyrights are created – one for the sound recording and one for the musical composition.

 

What is a Music Publisher

A music publisher works with songwriters to market and promote their songs, resulting in exposure of songs to the public and generating income. Music publishers “pitch” songs to record labels, movie and television producers and others who use music, then license the right to use the song and collect fees for the usage. Those fees are then split with the songwriter.

 

Music Publishers and Record Labels

Songwriters enter into publishing, co-publishing, or administration agreements with music publishers. In exchange for acquiring the copyright, a portion of the copyright, or a percentage of the revenue earned from the exploitation of the musical composition, the music publisher seeks opportunities to exploit the musical composition, collects revenue from the exploitation, and pays and accounts to the songwriter. The music publisher share is usually 50%.

Recording artists assign their copyrights to a record label in exchange for a negotiated royalty.

 

NMPA

The National Music Publishers’ Association (NMPA) was founded in 1917, NMPA is a trade association representing over 800 American music publishing companies in the United States. Its mission is to protect its members’ intellectual property rights on the legislative, litigation and regulatory fronts. The NMPA is the voice of both small and large music publishers and remains the most active and vocal proponent for the interest of music publishers and songwriters in the US and throughout the world. The NMPA also wholly owns and controls the Harry Fox Agency, the largest mechanical rights collecting society in the United States, with over 36,000 publishing members.

 

Types of Licenses Issued by Music Publishers

  • Reproduction (Mechanical) Licenses
    Music distributed in physical and digital form. The royalties are generally collected and paid by the Harry Fox Agency.
  • Public Performance
    Licenses Music broadcast on radio (terrestrial and satellite), in live venues, and other public places. The royalties are collected and paid by public performance societies (ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC). Each broadcaster receives a blanket license from each performing rights society, in exchange for a royalty fee.
  • Synchronization Licenses
    Music used in film, television, commercials, music videos, etc. Publishers enter into direct licenses with users.
  • Folio Licenses
    Music published in written form as lyrics and music notation either as bound music folios or online lyric and tablature websites. Publishers enter into direct licenses with users.

 

First Use of Musical Composition

Songwriters and recording artists generally have the right to approve first use of their work.

Recording artists (or their record labels) continue to have the right to approve subsequent uses of their sound recordings by third parties.

While songwriters (or their publishers) generally have the right to approve subsequent uses of their musical compositions, the songwriter does not have an absolute right to approve the reproduction of their musical composition in copies and phonorecords. Sec. 115 of the Copyright Act provides that a user may secure a compulsory license to make copies and phonorecords of the musical composition, without the authority of the songwriter.

 

Section 115 Compulsory License Requirements

  •   – The musical composition must be a non-dramatic musical work (not an opera or musical.)
  •   – The musical composition must be previously recorded.
  •   – The previous recording has been distributed publicly in the U.S.; and
  •   – The use of the recording will be in phonorecords only (audio only).

 

Compulsory License Rate Setting

The royalty rate paid to the songwriter under a compulsory license is set by an independent government tribunal called the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB). The fi rst rate for a mechanical compulsory license – 2 cents a song – was initially set by Congress in 1909. Eventually the rate setting job was delegated to Copyright Arbitra-tion Panels. Finally, in 2002, Congress created the CRB to bring autonomy and accountability to the rate setting process.

 

Recent Ruling of the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB)

OCTOBER, 2008

In a ground-breaking ruling, the CRB established the following rates:

  • Physical Product – 9.1 cents
  • Digital Product – (digital phonorecord delivery) – 9.1 cents
  • Interactive Streaming – (for subscription services) and ephemeral copies – the industry stakeholders entered into a settlement agreement providing a percentage of revenue royalty. For the first time, the parties acknowledged that a mechanical royalty is due for interactive streaming.
  • Ringtones – 24 cents
  • Late Fee – for the first time, the CRB established a late fee of 1.5% per month, to be paid to the publishers if royalties payments are late.

 

The Harry Fox Agency

The compulsory license is issued by the Copyright Office. However, very few people secure compulsory licenses through the Copyright Office because of perceived onerous requirements like monthly accounting. Instead, most users secure a license through the Harry Fox Agency, which among other benefits, only requires quarterly accountings. More importantly, the Harry Fox license uses the CRB rate as a benchmark, so the CRB process is still very important.

 

Current Challenges

Controlled Compositions
Implementation of CRB Ruling – Late Fees
Collecting Performance Royalties in Audiovisual Downloads
Accelerating payments from record labels and other third-party users, like I-Tunes – flowthrough problem.
Piracy
Orphan works

Music Industry Contracts

It’s quite nice of you to put out free mix-tapes here and there, but aren’t you ready to start making money for what you do? I mean dang, $100 for a mix-tape cover, another what, $200 for CD duplication? Oh and let’s not forget the cost of studio time if you don’t own your own, or if you don’t have a very generous friend who has plenty of free time. The point is, it all adds up, and for an indie artist like yourself trying to get your name out there, it’s not cheap. The truth of the matter is that not everybody who’s good will get signed. So to you I say, stop waiting…stop waiting for a record deal, STOP WAITING to get paid for what you do. So once you’re good enough, and have a large enough following you can start making money right now. People like myself are willing to pay for good music. For example I paid $1 for Bop Skizzum’s Heavy Petting song, and now I’m saving up $7 to buy SP Double’s latest album. Catch my drift? Well when you’re ready to stop waiting, I put together a couple music industry contracts that you can edit to fit your situation. I suggest you utilize them, even with your best friend(one word, Facebook.), because when you’re making big money everybody will want their cut. Good luck, and remember….business is business.

*Always consult with a lawyer*

Contents:

  1. Producer royalties Contract
  2. Recording studio contract
  3. Photographer contract
  4. Royalty agreement contract
  5. Sales contract
  6. Recording contract
  7. Distribution contract
  8. Performance contract
  9. Master recording license
  10. Personal management cotract
  11.  And more!….

[download id=”6944″]